Will New DOT Rules Make Travel More Accessible
Since I’m a traveler with disabilities, my eyes become wide
open reading about the latest developments on travel accessibility. So, when I learned about the new regulations
that the Department of Transportation (DOT) issued on accessible websites and
kiosks, my imagination went wild. Maybe
now I actually could book airline reservations without rushing to avoid a
15-minute timeout when I’d be compelled to re-enter all my data. Not yet, I’m afraid.
The DOT’s website-and-kiosk regulations, which are
amendments to the Air
Carriers’ Act of 1986, allows airlines two years to make their websites accessible to
persons with disabilities. At that, they
won’t even be required to make their websites completely accessible for another
year, only the core features such as pages with information on how to store
special equipment on planes and how to request assistance. DOT
bases the requirements on the World Wide Consortium Web Accessibility
Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0).
Apparently, the DOT thinks making something accessible takes
years. It seems to be oblivious of the thousands
of companies that have made their websites accessible since the conception of
WCAG 2.0 in 2008. To make a 200-page website
accessible (i.e. placing text alternatives on images, labeling form fields,
structuring headings and data tables, etc.), for example, the estimate would be
three months, not three years.
As for kiosks, the requirement period extends to ten years
for airlines to purchase new accessible ones, which could have been purchased
from IBM years ago. The new DOT
regulations do not even require existing kiosks to be remediated for
accessibility. If existing kiosks were
required to be retrofitted, all they’d need are headphones so persons who are
blind could hear the synthesized voice in private; a keyboard with tactile
keys, and software that already would be accessible. Delivery and implementation of these
components could take weeks, not ten years.
So why is DOT being so time lenient towards airlines
fulfilling the accessibility requirements?
One possible reason is that those at DOT who wrote these regulations
didn’t research how quickly technology can become accessible. However, this reason may be hard to swallow
since the DOT has been receiving complaints from consumers on the topic for
years. Surely, some of these complaints have
outlined how easy making websites accessible can be.
Additionally, the DOT has been involved in lawsuits against
JetBlue Airlines on the inaccessibility of its website and kiosks. In the case, the DOT determined that web
fares could be provided through the telephone.
At least now the government entity is acknowledging that airline
websites and kiosks should be accessible, though the declaration may not be
stern enough.
What about cruise ships, trains, and buses? Complaints about their sites and kiosks have
not inundated the DOT yet. Maybe in
twenty years, all travel-based information technology will become accessible.